Re: LogwrtResult contended spinlock

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(dot)casanova(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: LogwrtResult contended spinlock
Date: 2021-11-04 12:12:13
Message-ID: 852C0625-F333-4AA0-A7B5-D4413539B683@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 8 Sep 2021, at 17:14, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 08:19:19PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> So I addressed about half of your comments in this version merely by
>> fixing silly bugs. The problem I had which I described as
>> "synchronization fails" was one of those silly bugs.
>>
>
> Hi Álvaro,
>
> Are we waiting for another version of the patch based on Andres'
> comments? Or this version is good enough for testing?

Any update on this? Should the patch be reset back to "Needs review" or will
there be a new version?

--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2021-11-04 12:24:21 Re: should INSERT SELECT use a BulkInsertState?
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2021-11-04 12:09:59 Re: [PROPOSAL] new diagnostic items for the dynamic sql