| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org,Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>,Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>,Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>,Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>,Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>,Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Online enabling of checksums |
| Date: | 2018-04-05 20:27:43 |
| Message-ID: | AE007145-90D6-4DB2-B1D1-E6D9A68675C6@anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On April 5, 2018 1:20:52 PM PDT, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 10:14 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
>wrote:
>
>And even worse, without even announcing an intent to commit and giving
>> people a chance to object.
>>
>
>At least this patch was posted on the lists before commit, unlike many
>others from many different people. And AFAIK there has never been such
>a
>rule.
The more debatable a decision is, the more important it IMO becomes to give people a chance to object. Don't think there needs to be a hard rule to always announce an intent to commit.
Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Naylor | 2018-04-05 20:28:10 | Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2018-04-05 20:20:52 | Re: Online enabling of checksums |