Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility
Date: 2021-08-10 13:27:18
Message-ID: ADF19C83-A163-4C0C-B197-61922799ABA8@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 6 Aug 2021, at 21:17, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
>> Until there is an animal running OpenSSL 3.0.0 in the buildfarm I think this
>> should be HEAD only. Further down the line we need to support OpenSSL 3 in all
>> backbranches IMO since they are all equally likely to be compiled against it,
>> but not until we can regularly test against it in the farm.
>
> Works for me.

These have now been committed, when OpenSSL 3.0.0 ships and there is coverage
in the buildfarm I’ll revisit this for the backbranches.

--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-08-10 13:27:33 Re: Autovacuum on partitioned table (autoanalyze)
Previous Message Greg Nancarrow 2021-08-10 13:27:14 Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side