Re: Out of memory for Select query.

From: Rusty Conover <rconover(at)infogears(dot)com>
To: Nimesh Satam <nimesh(dot)zedo(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, nsatam(at)zedo(dot)com
Subject: Re: Out of memory for Select query.
Date: 2008-06-30 06:59:16
Message-ID: ABE8D033-9127-495A-B96D-0D74FF9B232E@infogears.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Jun 29, 2008, at 10:20 PM, Nimesh Satam wrote:

> All,
>
> While running a Select query we get the below error:
>
> ERROR: out of memory
> DETAIL: Failed on request of size 192.
>
> Postgres Conf details:
> shared_buffers = 256000
> work_mem =150000
> max_stack_depth = 16384
> max_fsm_pages = 400000
> version: 8.1.3
>
> We are using 8gb of Primary memory for the server which is used as a
> dedicated database machine.
>
> The data log shows the below message after getting the Out of memory
> error. Also attached the explain for the query. Can someone let us
> know , if have some worng parameter setup or any solution to the
> problem?
>
> Regards,
> Nimesh.
>

Hi Nimesh,

I'd try decreasing work_mem (try something smaller like 16384 and work
up if you'd like), since you have lots of hashes being built for this
query, you may simply be running into a limit on process size
depending on your platform. Also look at "ulimit -a" as the postgres
user to make sure you aren't running into any administrative limits.

Cheers,

Rusty
--
Rusty Conover
InfoGears Inc.
http://www.infogears.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Moritz Onken 2008-06-30 07:16:44 Re: Planner should use index on a LIKE 'foo%' query
Previous Message Rusty Conover 2008-06-30 06:50:27 Re: Subquery WHERE IN or WHERE EXISTS faster?