| From: | Michael Grimm <trashcan(at)ellael(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Can logical replication be a solution to my current MariaDB/Galera setup? |
| Date: | 2026-05-24 14:01:17 |
| Message-ID: | AB452648-0449-44F2-8675-F06FC7F67C23@ellael.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
shammat(at)gmx(dot)net wrote:
> Am 22.05.26 um 15:18 schrieb Michael Grimm:
>> I have never run a postgres server before, but I do run a mariadb
>> galera cluster [1] for storing emails by an IMAP server [2].
>> Distribution and failover is dealt by haproxy [3].
>
> For such a system I don't see the need for a multi-master setup (neither
> with Postgres nor with MariaDB).
What I didn't mention in my mail is: incoming mails at all three mail servers become stored into each user's mailbox at the server they arrive (LMTP). In this scenario multi-master is handy.
But see below.
> For high availability you don't need multi-master. A standard
> streaming replication with a failover mechanism is completely enough
> in my opinion.
Thanks for this hint w.r.t. streaming replication.
I have made some research about this kind of cluster and come to the conclusion that streaming replication plus repmgr [1] will meet my expectations.
BUT: I will need to configure haproxy to route all IMAP and LMTP traffic to the "current" master, only.
I am hoping that this can be achieved by a customised health check plus routing, but I have never done that before, though.
Thanks and regards,
Michael
[1] available in the FreeBSD ports collection
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christoph Berg | 2026-05-26 16:07:29 | Re: Bitnami deprecation |
| Previous Message | shammat | 2026-05-23 06:33:59 | Re: Can logical replication be a solution to my current MariaDB/Galera setup? |