Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3
Date: 2008-07-15 18:07:49
Message-ID: AB235355-40E7-4B4D-8238-BC48AB6F5C28@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jul 15, 2008, at 07:09, Tom Lane wrote:

> Yeah, probably. I don't think the "make check" path will support it
> because it doesn't install contrib into the temp installation.
> (You'd also need to have put the extra entry in parallel_schedule
> not serial_schedule, but it's not gonna work anyway.)

Well now that was cool to see. I got some failures, of course, but
nothing stands out to me as an obvious bug. I attach the diffs file
(with the citext.sql failure removed) for your perusal. What would be
the best way for me to resolve those permission issues? Or do they
matter for sanity-checking citext?

Thanks,

David

Attachment Content-Type Size
regression.diffs application/octet-stream 8.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Mielke 2008-07-15 19:38:35 Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type
Previous Message Abhijit Menon-Sen 2008-07-15 17:45:00 Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type