Re: why two dashes in extension load files

From: Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: why two dashes in extension load files
Date: 2011-02-14 19:31:45
Message-ID: AANLkTinwzVTRBy2g5aAorgvgJHMLNBqb=9sMCu6Bb0=b@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2011/2/14 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> "David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
>> On Feb 14, 2011, at 8:54 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> I'm not convinced.  There was nothing in that discussion why any
>>>> particular character would have to be allowed in a version number.
>
>>> Well, there's already a counterexample in the current contrib stuff:
>>> uuid-ossp.  We could rename that to uuid_ossp of course, but it's
>>> not clear to me that there's consensus for forbidding dashes here.

why do we care if there is a dash in the middle of a text where there
are no numbers ?

>
>> I'd be fine if commas were used instead.
>
> Commas do not seem like an improvement to me at all --- they are widely
> used as list separators.
>
> I guess the real question is what's Peter's concrete objection to the
> double-dash method?

I have to admit that I am a bit surprised by this -- stuff too.
An objection might be completely non-technical, but advocacy :

"what this funny new name convention those PostgreSQL folks did invent ?!"

--
Cédric Villemain               2ndQuadrant
http://2ndQuadrant.fr/     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-02-14 19:49:25 pageinspect's infomask and infomask2 as smallint
Previous Message Noah Misch 2011-02-14 19:15:24 Re: ALTER TYPE 2: skip already-provable no-work rewrites