Re: is_absolute_path incorrect on Windows

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Giles Lean <giles(dot)lean(at)pobox(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: is_absolute_path incorrect on Windows
Date: 2010-06-01 20:04:02
Message-ID: AANLkTinwcUtEWC_rNMLZHWePs77ysSuhUPyIEW9Jf1zb@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Giles Lean <giles(dot)lean(at)pobox(dot)com> wrote:
> 1. is_relative_to_cwd() I continue to think is a bad name for something
>   concerned about ".." (plus on Windows not having a drive letter other
>   than the current one); the "normal" meaning of "relative path" is
>   merely "not absolute"

Maybe something like is_under_cwd()?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2010-06-01 20:10:33 Re: [RFC] A tackle to the leaky VIEWs for RLS
Previous Message Giles Lean 2010-06-01 19:20:18 Re: is_absolute_path incorrect on Windows