Re: replication solution

From: Rosser Schwarz <rosser(dot)schwarz(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: Silvio Brandani <silvio(dot)brandani(at)tech(dot)sdb(dot)it>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: replication solution
Date: 2010-08-24 21:43:07
Message-ID: AANLkTinwGJZsrhXJeOXgPTsJY9M4aCOLOSCqUdQttnzk@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 15:46 +0200, Silvio Brandani wrote:
>> The Slony solution could be a possibility but the production database is
>> 80 Gb of data with  around 10000 transaction each hour.

> Slony (or Londiste) can handle that without issue, at all.

Bucardo, too. All three work on similar principles.

rls

--
:wq

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-08-24 23:56:31 Re: HS/SR on AIX
Previous Message Steve Singer 2010-08-24 21:39:57 HS/SR on AIX