| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Synchronization levels in SR |
| Date: | 2010-05-26 19:37:49 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinulcT259_tEChrfPqnSe3luImYR4a9zKFz28ah@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> I don't really understand this comment. I have said, and I believe,
>> that a system without quorum commit is simpler than one with quorum
>> commit. I'd debate the point with you but I find the point so
>> self-evident that I don't even know where to begin arguing it.
>
>> It's simply an opinion, which I believe to
>> be based on solid technical reasoning, but which I might change my
>> mind about if someone convinces me that I'm looking at the problem the
>> wrong way.
>
> You're saying you have solid technical reasons, but they are so
> self-evident that you can't even begin to argue them. Why are you so
> sure your reasons are solid?? Regrettably, I say this doesn't make any
> sense, however much you write.
Yeah, especially when you juxtapose two different parts of my email
that were talking about different things.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2010-05-26 19:41:13 | Re: Synchronization levels in SR |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-05-26 19:26:03 | Re: psql \? \daS |