| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Srini Raghavan <sixersrini(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Database file copy |
| Date: | 2011-01-14 20:43:36 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinsO6QXP=5tN9gboKVtCdXoHGtpszDSKZXXmkEq@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> I'm not wildly enthusiastic about breaking this with only one
>> intervening release. We normally support deprecated syntax for
>> quite a bit longer than that.
>
> "one intervening release"? Where did you see that?
>
> I thought we were just talking about deprecating the old syntax, not
> breaking it. If history is any guide, getting the deprecation
> mentioned in the docs now would lead to actual removal somewhere
> around 10.0.
Oh, I guess I'm confused then...
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marti Raudsepp | 2011-01-14 20:45:06 | Re: [PATCH] Return command tag 'REPLACE X' for CREATE OR REPLACE statements. |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2011-01-14 20:41:39 | Named restore points |