| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: .gitignore files, take two |
| Date: | 2010-09-21 20:13:13 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinrtWgR5BFKx__UGkc+mV5=cNY5ea8cwkfPUFNt@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 22:11, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>>> Do we know what the exact pattern would be for .sl and .dylib? Are
>>> they following the same basic pattern of .sl.<major>.<minor>?
>
>> Yes, they'll be just the same --- Makefile.shlib treats all those
>> extensions alike.
>
> I take that back. Darwin does things differently, bless their pointy
> little heads:
>
> DLSUFFIX = .dylib
> shlib = lib$(NAME).$(SO_MAJOR_VERSION).$(SO_MINOR_VERSION)$(DLSUFFIX)
>
> So it looks like *.dylib is sufficient and we don't need anything with
> numbers afterwards for that variant.
Ok. Just to be clear, here's what I have now:
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| gitignore.patch | text/x-patch | 19.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-21 20:15:33 | Re: .gitignore files, take two |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-21 20:11:50 | Re: .gitignore files, take two |