Re: obj_unique_identifier(oid)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Joel Jacobson <joel(at)gluefinance(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Herrera Alvaro <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: obj_unique_identifier(oid)
Date: 2011-01-08 20:44:09
Message-ID: AANLkTinri1T99hN1O1wOjiva01AgWQdWXn1U7RdKDr6N@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)gluefinance(dot)com> wrote:
> The query below should not return any rows, because if it does, then
> there are oids with non-unique descriptions.

I don't think your analysis is correct. Each entry in pg_depend
represents the fact that one object depends on another object, and an
object could easily depend on more than one other object, or be
depended upon by more than one other object, or depend on one object
and be depended on by another.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-01-08 20:47:16 Re: WIP: Range Types
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2011-01-08 20:12:42 Re: WIP: Range Types