From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Remove name as valid parameter for catalog functions |
Date: | 2011-03-08 03:33:17 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinqhEOrD1yV-YGEoktRKi2oqyzoJdmL5QX5oJ_7@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers pgsql-docs |
On 8 March 2011 02:54, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> writes:
>> On 7 March 2011 23:30, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Maybe we could say "the name or OID of a table", or some such phrase,
>>> so as to subtly avoid the expectation that what is being referred to
>>> is the datatype named "name"?
>
>> Yes, that would remove the ambiguity. :)
>
> That wording turned out not to work well in context, at least not
> without major surgery on the containing sentences. I decided that
> the best way was to just say "specified table" in the function tables,
> and then borrow the paragraph that explains about regclass
> arguments from the sequence-functions page.
Thanks Tom.
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2011-03-08 07:31:44 | pgAdmin III commit: Replace all the XPM images in pgAdmin with PNG ones |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-03-07 21:24:48 | Re: Remove name as valid parameter for catalog functions |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thom Brown | 2011-03-08 15:01:11 | Re: [HACKERS] Sync rep doc corrections |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-03-07 21:24:48 | Re: Remove name as valid parameter for catalog functions |