From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CVS in docs |
Date: | 2010-09-22 18:42:18 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinqVbEuzBPj_EEtPp3n7Zzj_2+wrzeBus_UPUgG@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 20:37, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 20:25, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Uh, why only back to 8.2?
>
>> Based on the "the others are discontinued just over a month from now anyway"...
>
> Yeah, but they will each have a final release. Don't we want to have
> the updated info in the final releases? I don't care about the
> incidental CVS mentions, but replacing cvs.sgml with that new chapter
> seems worth the trouble.
Hmm. yeah. I'll look at doing it back to 7.4 then. I'll do the
incidental mentions as well if they merge cleanly :-)
>> BTW, there are a ton of conflicts backpatching each step.
>
> Welcome to the fun of back-patching. Did you get any leverage from
Oh, it's not the first time. I just wanted to make note that one, but
only one, conflicted on the $PostgreSQL$ tag.
> cherry-picking, or did it seem to be just as stupid as plain "patch"?
It *seemed* smarter. But I didn't try to backpatchthe same thing both
ways, so it's hard to tell for sure.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Kupershmidt | 2010-09-22 19:41:55 | Capitalization of "PL/pgSQL" |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-22 18:37:07 | Re: CVS in docs |