| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CVS in docs |
| Date: | 2010-09-22 18:37:07 |
| Message-ID: | 29254.1285180627@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 20:25, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Uh, why only back to 8.2?
> Based on the "the others are discontinued just over a month from now anyway"...
Yeah, but they will each have a final release. Don't we want to have
the updated info in the final releases? I don't care about the
incidental CVS mentions, but replacing cvs.sgml with that new chapter
seems worth the trouble.
> BTW, there are a ton of conflicts backpatching each step.
Welcome to the fun of back-patching. Did you get any leverage from
cherry-picking, or did it seem to be just as stupid as plain "patch"?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-09-22 18:42:18 | Re: CVS in docs |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-09-22 18:28:09 | Re: CVS in docs |