Re: PG 9.1 tentative timeline

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "Pr, Solaiyappan (NSN - IN/Bangalore)" <solaiyappan(dot)pr(at)nsn(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PG 9.1 tentative timeline
Date: 2010-06-13 16:03:56
Message-ID: AANLkTinpgu7pSyxRUaONtiuo3iEMrgG7AcETbeoHddgt@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On fre, 2010-06-11 at 08:15 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> * Pr, Solaiyappan (NSN - IN/Bangalore) (solaiyappan(dot)pr(at)nsn(dot)com) wrote:
>> > I understand this is very early to ask this.. but, is there any tentative timeline has been planned / available for the PostgreSQL 9.1 release, like for the alpha or beta releases before the general release?
>>
>> The tentative timeline is "more-or-less the same as 9.0 went".  That is
>> to say, we're hopeful to start a commitfest July 15th, finish by Auguet
>> 15th, cut alpha1, then switch to GIT for the main repo, and start the
>> next commitfets September 15th.
>
> I wrote it down now:
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.1_Development_Plan

Thanks! Looks good, except I thought our plan was to cut alpha1
before the git switch. Or maybe it doesn't matter? Not sure.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-06-13 16:11:49 Re: PG 9.1 tentative timeline
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-06-13 14:00:16 Re: Re: [PERFORM] Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 8.4.4?