Re: Suggesting a libpq addition

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Marc Balmer <marc(at)msys(dot)ch>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Suggesting a libpq addition
Date: 2010-12-05 10:01:46
Message-ID: AANLkTinpOM5fQF7bRFNWTdgK8qWZ1kOSsCeZOwfvPEuj@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2010/12/5 Marc Balmer <marc(at)msys(dot)ch>:
> I am suggesting adding a function to libpq:
>
> PGresult *PQvexec(PGconn *conn, const char *fmt, ...);
>
> It behaves similar to PQexec, but it allows for printf style varargs and
> does connection re-establishing if the connection fails (it can be
> discussed if this already to much magic, maybe remove this part).  It
> has been carefully designed to handle memory the right way.  We use this
> since a long time.
>
> What do you think?
>

It's depend on implementation, but it can be a great security hole -
see SQL injection

Regards

Pavel Stehule

>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2010-12-05 10:10:01 Re: Suggesting a libpq addition
Previous Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2010-12-05 09:47:37 Re: profiling connection overhead