Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Anssi Kääriäinen <anssi(dot)kaariainen(at)thl(dot)fi>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3
Date: 2011-02-03 16:29:49
Message-ID: AANLkTinp-nTjbEjD4=DEsf3cJ_7i1z9o=dXv86X+AqH_@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Ross J. Reedstrom <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> wrote:
>> Speaking about which, using Make rules to prepare your upgrade files
>> from other pieces means no development at all on the backend side.  You
>> can hardly beat that.
>
> Yes, from the backend-developer's perspective. But not from the
> extension-developer's perspective :-) And seriously, make is one of
> those things that is supremely capable of doing lots of stuff, but is so
> difficult to use correctly that everyone keeps reinventing newer wheels.
> Seems this one isn't round enough.

Not to mention the fact that make doesn't work on Windows, so any
extensions that rely on this will need hacks in the MSVC build system.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-02-03 16:34:07 Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3
Previous Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2011-02-03 16:25:50 Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3