Re: disposition of remaining patches

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié feb 23 15:14:04 -0300 2011:
>> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié feb 23 14:54:02 -0300 2011:
>> >> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> > 16. synchronized snapshots.  Alvaro is working on this one.
>> >>
>> >> Lots of discussion of this one, but current status is not clear to me.
>> >>  Alvaro, are you working on this actively?
>> >
>> > I am.  I'm not sure if it's still reasonable to get into 9.1, given that
>> > it needs to be rewritten from almost completely from scratch.
>>
>> Well, if it gets punted, I won't be too sad, since the pg_dump patch
>> to actually use this functionality for something useful already got
>> pushed off.
>
> Oh, I thought that patch was committed which is why I was in a bit of a
> hurry.  I will mark this one "returned with feedback" too, then.

No, the directory archive format patch was committed, but the parallel
pg_dump one got pushed off.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company