Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Old git repo

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Old git repo
Date: 2010-12-31 09:58:34
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 03:04, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
>> Personally, my utility for the old repo is not much (if it was anything
>> important, I wouldn't have relied on the unofficial repo). But we should
>> probably give a little bit of warning for folks that might want to
>> rebase or translate some old notes.
> Well, I guess the question is how much warning.  I suggested O(1 week)
> but Robert seems to want O(1 year).  As long as there's some agreed
> deadline, I'm not very picky about what it is.

I don't need to get rid of it *now*, but I agree a deadline is good.

How about we either say "when 9.1 is released", or we say "september
2011" because that's a year after we made the switch?

 Magnus Hagander

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2010-12-31 10:06:12
Subject: Re: Sync Rep Design
Previous:From: Stefan KaltenbrunnerDate: 2010-12-31 09:42:14
Subject: Re: Snapshot synchronization, again...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group