Re: Old git repo

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Old git repo
Date: 2010-12-31 02:04:11
Message-ID: 15433.1293761051@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
> Personally, my utility for the old repo is not much (if it was anything
> important, I wouldn't have relied on the unofficial repo). But we should
> probably give a little bit of warning for folks that might want to
> rebase or translate some old notes.

Well, I guess the question is how much warning. I suggested O(1 week)
but Robert seems to want O(1 year). As long as there's some agreed
deadline, I'm not very picky about what it is.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-12-31 02:19:26 Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-12-31 02:02:04 Re: estimating # of distinct values