On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> wrote:
> Lost it a little from my radar, but here's is a first shot on this issue
> now. The patch creates a new CONSTRAINT_NOTNULL contype and assigns all
> required information for the NOT NULL constraint to it. Currently the
> constraint records the attribute number it belongs to and manages the
> inheritance properties. Passes regression tests with some adjustments to
> pg_constraint output.
Confirmed that this tests fine against commit id
I also wrote a little test script and verified that it throws an error
when I try to remove a constraint from the parent table.
Should an explicit test be added for this?
There are some spelling and grammar errors in comments that I can help
fix if you want the help.
http://chesnok.com/daily - me
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: KaiGai Kohei||Date: 2010-06-16 04:54:31|
|Subject: Re: [v9.1] Add security hook on initialization of instance|
|Previous:||From: Takahiro Itagaki||Date: 2010-06-16 03:24:34|
|Subject: Re: debug log in pg_archivecleanup|