From: | Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ALTER TABLE...ALTER COLUMN vs inheritance |
Date: | 2010-06-16 03:51:21 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTindtMfZo4EEhr-zcVQL3epuJmPmeJ6MhXJd-4F-@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> wrote:
> Lost it a little from my radar, but here's is a first shot on this issue
> now. The patch creates a new CONSTRAINT_NOTNULL contype and assigns all
> required information for the NOT NULL constraint to it. Currently the
> constraint records the attribute number it belongs to and manages the
> inheritance properties. Passes regression tests with some adjustments to
> pg_constraint output.
Confirmed that this tests fine against commit id
0dca7d2f70872a242d4430c4c3aa01ba8dbd4a8c
I also wrote a little test script and verified that it throws an error
when I try to remove a constraint from the parent table.
Should an explicit test be added for this?
There are some spelling and grammar errors in comments that I can help
fix if you want the help.
-selena
--
http://chesnok.com/daily - me
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2010-06-16 04:54:31 | Re: [v9.1] Add security hook on initialization of instance |
Previous Message | Takahiro Itagaki | 2010-06-16 03:24:34 | Re: debug log in pg_archivecleanup |