From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Backups from the standby (Incrementally Updated Backups), open item |
Date: | 2010-08-25 08:14:54 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTincUMfs_NJVjH4q=55mLBWu3oveqwMSQbfz4aTB@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 5:44 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Again, given that this is a method which is (a) fairly minority-need,
> and (b) not at all tested in the field, I do not think it belongs in the
> main docs. Let's put it on the wiki and blog about it, and AFTER we've
> collected bug reports and have something relatively bulletproof for 9.1,
> THEN we put it in the main docs.
>
> We really shouldn't have anything in the main docs related to backup
> which isn't 100% tested.
The procedure has been since 8.2. We should remove it from the documents
since 8.2?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-08-25 08:18:01 | Re: git: uh-oh |
Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2010-08-25 07:58:25 | Re: EXPLAIN doesn't show the actual function expression for FunctionScan |