track_functions default

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: track_functions default
Date: 2010-11-16 13:17:32
Message-ID: AANLkTincNZPtezPhNZsK5kkptBkNxE-k5am6hL57U3kj@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Is there a particular reason why track_functions is disabled by default?

Does having it at 'pl' by default create a noticable overhead for
people who aren't using pl functions? Or for that matter, even a
noticable overhead for those that *are*?

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2010-11-16 14:41:38 GCC vs clang
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2010-11-16 11:45:29 Re: Isn't HANDLE 64 bits on Win64?