| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
| Cc: | Ben Carbery <ben(dot)carbery(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_listener table errors with slony |
| Date: | 2011-01-19 21:47:42 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinbJtvSRsHhmxYsAjR_NwzCSzM50pmK_EXfSz+R@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-support |
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> Le 19/01/2011 22:33, Dave Page a écrit :
>
>> Plus, it's just one of many replication engines.
>>
>
> This isn't a good reason to me. I would like to see something alike for SR.
My point is, why should we support one external replication engine
over another? Originally, it was because Slony was the only one worth
considering, but that really isn't the case any more.
I think SR is a different case - it's part of PostgreSQL, so certainly
should be supported as makes sense.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2011-01-19 21:56:52 | Re: pg_listener table errors with slony |
| Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2011-01-19 21:40:55 | Re: pg_listener table errors with slony |