Re: system views for walsender activity

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: system views for walsender activity
Date: 2011-01-07 21:21:56
Message-ID: AANLkTinaSTT6=s9Fs2z_PTb+pgdu_FAjeu=JeJ05i5xJ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> To my way of thinking, pg_stat_walsender and pg_stat_walreceiver would
>> be more clear than pg_stat_replication_master and
>> pg_stat_replication_slave.
>
> Let's commit it so that some of us can get a look at the data it
> contains, and then we can fix the name during beta.

Well, the first half is committed, under the name pg_stat_replication.
So go look at that, for starters...

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2011-01-07 21:31:49 Re: Streaming base backups
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-01-07 21:21:05 Re: LOCK for non-tables