Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Seeking Mentors for Funded Reviewers

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Richard Broersma <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Seeking Mentors for Funded Reviewers
Date: 2011-01-26 22:39:47
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-rrreviewers
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Richard Broersma
<richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I'm not sure what you mean by this.
> Now that I read it, I not sure what I meant either. :)  How about this: the
> selection, management, and oversight of grants and mentees should be opaque
> to the community so as to prevent distraction.  There should be no
> appearance of community endorsement of such programs.

I think there's no need to announce who you've made grants too, if
that's what you mean.  But it shouldn't be hidden from the community
either.  We ought to know who to praise/blame if something good/bad

Robert Haas
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-01-26 22:40:28
Subject: Re: new compiler warnings
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-01-26 22:35:23
Subject: Re: ALTER TYPE 3: add facility to identify further no-work cases

pgsql-rrreviewers by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2011-01-27 00:45:32
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Seeking Mentors for Funded Reviewers
Previous:From: Richard BroersmaDate: 2011-01-26 22:30:56
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Seeking Mentors for Funded Reviewers

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group