Re: PG 9.0 release timetable

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 release timetable
Date: 2010-05-29 21:09:02
Message-ID: AANLkTinUgrEg6wBbj-Chr1paF8RzMRGaAJjffHhFswBu@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Assuming we want a release Postgres 9.0 by mid-August, here is how the
> timetable would look:
>
>        Need RC release to be stable for 1-2 weeks before final
>                RC must be released by August 1
>        Beta must be stable for 2-3 weeks before RC
>                Stable beta must be released by early July
>
> So, we have 5-6 weeks to get a stable beta.  Looking at the open issues:
>
>        http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.0_Open_Items#Resolved_Issues
>
> it looks like we are doing OK, but we must continue progressing.

This is a really short list. Several of these items have already been
fixed, and others have been discussed extensively and are just a
question of making a final decision. The thorniest question we have
yet to resolve is what to do about max_standby_delay - I think we need
Tom and Heikki to review this patch by Simon:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-05/msg01666.php

The real question in terms of release, I think, is how long we want to
wait for more bugs to be found, and/or how much time do we want to
allow for Tom and others to do further review of the code.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-05-29 21:11:17 Re: Performance problem in textanycat/anytextcat
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-05-29 20:43:54 Re: Performance problem in textanycat/anytextcat