Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix various possible problems with synchronous replication.

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
> On 17 March 2011 17:55, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>>> errdetail("The transaction has already been committed locally but
>>> might have not been replicated to the standby.")));
>>> errdetail("The transaction has committed locally, but may not have
>>> replicated to the standby.")));
>>>
>>> Could we have these saying precisely the same thing?
>>
>> Yeah.  Which is better?
>
> Personally I prefer the 2nd.  It reads better somehow.

I hacked on this a bit more and ended up with a hybrid of the two.
Hope you like it; but anyway it's consistent.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company