Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix various possible problems with synchronous replication.

On 18 March 2011 14:23, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 17 March 2011 17:55, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> errdetail("The transaction has already been committed locally but
>>>> might have not been replicated to the standby.")));
>>>> errdetail("The transaction has committed locally, but may not have
>>>> replicated to the standby.")));
>>>>
>>>> Could we have these saying precisely the same thing?
>>>
>>> Yeah.  Which is better?
>>
>> Personally I prefer the 2nd.  It reads better somehow.
>
> I hacked on this a bit more and ended up with a hybrid of the two.
> Hope you like it; but anyway it's consistent.

Yes, cheers :)

--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company