Re: Additional options for Sync Replication

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Additional options for Sync Replication
Date: 2011-03-28 09:59:52
Message-ID: AANLkTinPvC1A+BEhp2Dz-wSH9P7Yx6ZfBHkuo4sNfVM0@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:

> Also, for what it's worth I prefer thinking of
> synchronous_commit/synchronous_replication as one big multi-way
> variable:
>
> synchronous_commit  = memory | disk | replica-memory | replica-disk |
> replica-visible

That's close enough to my thinking for me to say yes to.

I'd prefer to call it "commit_durability" though.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2011-03-28 10:14:10 Re: Additional options for Sync Replication
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2011-03-28 09:52:15 Re: Additional options for Sync Replication