Re: Bitmask trickiness

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Howard Rogers <hjr(at)diznix(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bitmask trickiness
Date: 2010-07-21 08:08:16
Message-ID: AANLkTinPMGOBcyiA5ul1DNH6nv3lDblSiCRcBeIukuZG@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Howard Rogers <hjr(at)diznix(dot)com> wrote:
> Suppose 1=Red, 2=Yellow, 4=Green and 8=Orange.
>
> Now suppose the following data structures and rows exist:
>
> create table coloursample (recid integer, colour integer, descript varchar);
> insert into coloursample values (1,2,'Yellow only');
> insert into coloursample values (2,10,'Yellow and Orange');
> insert into coloursample values (3,11,'Red, Yellow and Orange');
> insert into coloursample values (4,12,'Green and Orange');
> insert into coloursample values (5,13,'Red, Green and Orange');

Is there a reason you're avoiding bit strings?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/datatype-bit.html
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-bitstring.html

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Otto 2010-07-21 08:17:28 Re: INSERT RETURNING and partitioning
Previous Message pdovera@tiscali.it 2010-07-21 08:02:54 Re: INSERT RETURNING and partitioning