| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: wrapping up this CommitFest (was Re: knngist - 0.8) |
| Date: | 2011-03-01 20:40:36 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinOynqyoEQ8qnQW7yGkJFxKFCMzeNHyC00UK17J@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> That's still missing the point, which is that the code is unlikely to
>> be up to our usual standards at that point.
>
> I was talking about "when do we close the CF and start building an
> alpha", not synch rep particularly. Tom said he wants until Friday
> anyway just for some cleanup.
That response is just dodging the hard question, so whatever. Tom's
cleanup is not going to break things, or at least it's going to fix
more than it breaks on net. Sync rep, on the other hand, is going to
do the opposite, probably by a large margin.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-03-01 20:41:21 | Re: wrapping up this CommitFest (was Re: knngist - 0.8) |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2011-03-01 20:36:10 | Re: wrapping up this CommitFest (was Re: knngist - 0.8) |