| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2? |
| Date: | 2010-06-04 11:00:27 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinNiwP_hpltx25EnD_fW__idDiRZ6I1jKvpJlQU@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> writes:
>> On Jun 3, 2010, at 19:00 , Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Maybe we should just get rid of the hint.
>
>> FYI, Robert Haas suggested the same in the thread that lead to this patch being applied. The arguments against doing that is that a real crash during recovery *is* something to be quite alarmed about.
>
> After some discussion among core we're going to leave it as-is. Anybody
> who doesn't want to initdb for beta2 can test out pg_upgrade ;-)
Shouldn't we have bumped the catversion? The installers can't tell
that beta1 clusters won't work with beta2 :-(
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2010-06-04 11:47:19 | Re: Idea for getting rid of VACUUM FREEZE on cold pages |
| Previous Message | Florian Pflug | 2010-06-04 10:59:39 | Re: PITR Recovery Question |