Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PERFORM] pgbench to the MAXINT

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] pgbench to the MAXINT
Date: 2011-01-30 20:09:20
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for picking this up again and finishing the thing off.  I'll add this
> into my queue of performance tests to run and we can see if this is worth
> applying.  Probably take a little longer than the usual CF review time.  But
> as this doesn't interfere with other code people are working on and is sort
> of a bug fix, I don't think it will be a problem if it takes a little longer
> to get this done.

At least in my book, we need to get this committed in the next two
weeks, or wait for 9.2.

Robert Haas
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Mladen GogalaDate: 2011-01-30 20:11:51
Subject: Any experience using "shake" defragmenter?
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-01-30 19:25:23
Subject: Re: pgbench - tps for Postgresql-9.0.2 is more than tps for Postgresql-8.4.1

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-01-30 20:17:13
Subject: Re: log_checkpoints and restartpoint
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-01-30 20:06:01
Subject: Re: Visual Studio 2010/Windows SDK 7.1 support

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group