| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] pgbench to the MAXINT |
| Date: | 2011-01-30 20:09:20 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinJ0mqkS5sSx8kCm9x+miNeRXdPWaxfVEO8Szjg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for picking this up again and finishing the thing off. I'll add this
> into my queue of performance tests to run and we can see if this is worth
> applying. Probably take a little longer than the usual CF review time. But
> as this doesn't interfere with other code people are working on and is sort
> of a bug fix, I don't think it will be a problem if it takes a little longer
> to get this done.
At least in my book, we need to get this committed in the next two
weeks, or wait for 9.2.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-30 20:17:13 | Re: log_checkpoints and restartpoint |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-30 20:06:01 | Re: Visual Studio 2010/Windows SDK 7.1 support |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mladen Gogala | 2011-01-30 20:11:51 | Any experience using "shake" defragmenter? |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-30 19:25:23 | Re: pgbench - tps for Postgresql-9.0.2 is more than tps for Postgresql-8.4.1 |