| From: | David Blewett <david(at)dawninglight(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: compile/install of git |
| Date: | 2010-09-18 18:20:53 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinEfEttOcb_9sk1qpCjSxcdNVUB9TWmS+fcVJby@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Sorry for top-posting... I was under the impression that git over http was
just as efficient since 1.6.6 [1].
David Blewett
1. http://github.com/blog/642-smart-http-support
On Sep 18, 2010 12:26 PM, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
On 09/18/2010 11:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>>
>>> Test machines belong in ...
Right. I was just reacting to Bruce's observation about what people said
about his moving off BSD/OS.
> Bruce Momjian<bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>>
>> My big point in posting was to say that compiling...
Yeah. Git over HTTP is horribly inefficient anyway - it's really a last
resort.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
To make changes to your sub...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-09-18 18:30:03 | Re: compile/install of git |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-09-18 16:26:09 | Re: compile/install of git |