| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bug in autovacuum.c? |
| Date: | 2011-04-01 14:06:46 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinDsZSK_weu4EdRLWCBMve7aMnX=BdN9ar7dsic@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> OK, just keep going below 100:
>
> 105 -> 5
> 104 -> 4
> 103 -> 3
> 102 -> max_xid
> 101 -> max_xid - 1
> 100 -> max_xid - 2
> 99 -> max_id
> 98 -> max_id -1
>
> Wouldn't you rather:
>
> 105 -> 5
> 104 -> 4
> 103 -> 3
> 102 -> 3
> 101 -> 3
> 100 -> 3
> 99 -> max_id
> 98 -> max_id -1
Oh, quite right. Sorry I missed that. I suppose if we wanted to fix
this for real, we'd want to get:
105->5
104->4
103->3
102->max_xid
101->max_xid-1
100->max_xid-2
99->max_xid-3
98->max_xid-4
But it doesn't seem worth getting excited about.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-04-01 14:11:09 | Re: corner case about replication and shutdown |
| Previous Message | Rushabh Lathia | 2011-04-01 14:01:10 | Re: edb-postgres.exe has encountered a problem on windows |