From: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Extensible executor nodes for preparation of SQL/MED |
Date: | 2010-11-17 07:13:36 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinD-SJ5iou0Ap6SKWdP9W+sPzeXhjuDWM+Rawuj@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:51, Itagaki Takahiro
<itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 03:36, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> I am of the opinion that a run-time-extensible set of plan node types
>>> is merest fantasy. We will never have that, so putting in place 5%
>>> of the infrastructure for it is a waste of time and notational
>>> complexity.
>>
>> I think I agree; and moreover there's been no compelling argument made
>> why we would need that for SQL/MED anyway.
>
> I see. I'll cut useless parts from my patch.
I tested simplified version, but I cannot see measurable performance
improvement at this time. So, I'll turn down the whole proposal
to use function pointer calls. I'm sorry for all the fuss.
--
Itagaki Takahiro
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2010-11-17 07:15:37 | Re: Label switcher function |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-11-17 05:36:00 | Re: Adding nullable indicator to Describe |