Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Improved JDBC driver part 2

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Radosław Smogura <mail(at)smogura(dot)eu>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, Александър Шопов <lists(at)kambanaria(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Improved JDBC driver part 2
Date: 2010-12-01 11:47:13
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-jdbc
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 19:49, Radosław Smogura <mail(at)smogura(dot)eu> wrote:
> Hello,
> Maybe you are interested about this what I done with JDBC


> Driver is here is
> currently JDK 6 compatible (will be not), compressed patch takes about 136kb
> gziped.

Is there any particular reason why this work can't be maintained as a
branch to the main driver? My understanding is your work is based off
that one? Being able to work like that would make things a lot easier
to review.

That said, such a process would also be a lot easier if the JDBC
driver wasn't in cvs ;)

 Magnus Hagander

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Kristian NielsenDate: 2010-12-01 11:53:02
Subject: Re: We need index-only scans
Previous:From: Valentine GogichashviliDate: 2010-12-01 11:46:49
Subject: Re: DELETE with LIMIT (or my first hack)

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: LewDate: 2010-12-01 12:27:59
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Improved JDBC driver part 2
Previous:From: Radosław SmoguraDate: 2010-12-01 11:39:30
Subject: Re: Storing timestamps in text format

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group