From: | Radosław Smogura <rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Radosław Smogura <mail(at)smogura(dot)eu>, <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Александър Шопов <lists(at)kambanaria(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Improved JDBC driver part 2 |
Date: | 2010-12-01 13:59:39 |
Message-ID: | 5ddc12e74084b52d4dcc76b642cb9595@smogura-softworks.eu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:47:13 +0100, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 19:49, Radosław Smogura <mail(at)smogura(dot)eu> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Maybe you are interested about this what I done with JDBC
>
> <snip>
>
>
>> Driver is here
>> http://www.rsmogura.net/pgsql/pgjdbc_exp_20101130_C.tar.gz is
>> currently JDK 6 compatible (will be not), compressed patch takes about
>> 136kb
>> gziped.
>
> Is there any particular reason why this work can't be maintained as a
> branch to the main driver? My understanding is your work is based off
> that one? Being able to work like that would make things a lot easier
> to review.
Yes, it's based on this, with CVS subfolders in sources. I don't see any
problems to maintain this as branch. Ah only one need to read something
about CVS & branching.
> That said, such a process would also be a lot easier if the JDBC
> driver wasn't in cvs ;)
Yes, SVN is much more nicer.
>
> --
> Magnus Hagander
> Me: http://www.hagander.net/
> Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
--
----------
Radosław Smogura
http://www.softperience.eu
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-12-01 14:00:13 | Re: We really ought to do something about O_DIRECT and data=journalled on ext4 |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-12-01 13:53:12 | Re: crash-safe visibility map, take three |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2010-12-01 16:06:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Improved JDBC driver part 2 |
Previous Message | Lew | 2010-12-01 12:27:59 | Re: [HACKERS] Improved JDBC driver part 2 |