Re: string function - "format" function proposal

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: string function - "format" function proposal
Date: 2010-10-14 07:00:28
Message-ID: AANLkTinC=OfsMjtzQ1ECvCcxanhxrDTOOmV3++1DdTGm@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello

2010/10/14 Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> Let's make format support %s, %i, and %l, as well as
>> allowing things like %$3l (meaning, escape the third argument as a
>> literal and interpolate here), and call it good.
>
> Your idea is:
>  % [ $ pos ] format  -- ex. %$3l , %l
>  Escapes: %% => %
>
> Just for information, $ and pos are reversed in C sprintf.
>  % [ pos $ ] format  -- ex. %3$l , %l
>  Escapes: %% => %

ook - +1 for %3$l

>
> IMHO, I like {} syntax as like as C# because the format strings are extensible.
>  { pos [ : format ] } -- ex {3:l}, {3} (, and {l} could be also supported)
>  Escapes: {{ => {, }} => }
>

I dislike it. The target usage for this function is plpgsql code. I
prefer a simply design - second sprintf is useles. More - {} can be
used in messages relative often and with your proposal, you have to
intensivelly use a escaping.

Regards

Pavel

> --
> Itagaki Takahiro
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2010-10-14 07:39:15 Re: WIP: extensible enums
Previous Message Radosław Smogura 2010-10-14 06:59:23 Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al.