On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> I imagine the reason for the original coding was to avoid a useless
>>> gettimeofday kernel call in the common case that there are no
>>> conflicting xacts to wait for. Could we restore that behavior?
>> Something like the attached?
> I would just add the return-at-the-top. Changing the loop logic is
> not necessary --- the loop test is cheap.
Hmm... that's a fine bit of hairsplitting, but OK.
Done that way, then.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-12-17 16:38:22|
|Subject: Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) |
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2010-12-17 16:28:12|
|Subject: Re: Unnecessary limit on max_standby_streaming_delay|
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2010-12-17 17:00:52|
|Subject: pgsql: Backpatch plperl GNUmakefile fixes to allow building release8.2|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-12-17 16:33:02|
|Subject: pgsql: Try to save a kernel call inResolveRecoveryConflictWithVirtualX|