Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Issues with dlgType

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Issues with dlgType
Date: 2010-10-22 08:01:09
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> Hi,
> I've found quite a few bugs in the way we handle the dlgType dialog, and
> more to the point the Length and Precision textboxes. I use some time to
> work on this on my 11 hour plane trip, and I have this patch. The big
> issue I see is that it really contains a lot of changes. I'm not sure it
> is appropriate to apply it on 1.12.
> Actually, I want to apply it on 1.12. But I would like to know what
> others think about it.

Can you explain what the issues are please? Validating a patch against
unknown intent isn't easy.

Dave Page
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK:
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to


pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2010-10-22 08:54:37
Subject: Dynamic linking on Windows
Previous:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2010-10-21 23:29:55
Subject: Issues with dlgType

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group