| From: | Richard Broersma <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Radosław Smogura <rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-jdbc <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-odbc <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Comparing Enumerated Types between JDBC and ODBC drivers |
| Date: | 2010-12-22 15:20:49 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTin5kq+m58gt6MpoezDk39vkuWQdfA93Xn=rZEn9@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc pgsql-odbc |
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Radosław Smogura
<rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu> wrote:
> If you want SQL COMPOSITE types, only one way to access them (as I think),
> is similarly, by get/set String. JDBC driver doesn't support custom mapping
> of UDT to Java classes.
>
> It's looks ODBC driver has better support for PSQL.
I think I understand. Would you say that the underlying issue here is
the difference between the JDBC and ODBC specification?
--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2010-12-22 17:01:18 | Re: Bug with DatabaseMetaData and temporary tables/schemas |
| Previous Message | Radosław Smogura | 2010-12-22 14:11:08 | Re: Comparing Enumerated Types between JDBC and ODBC drivers |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andriy Rysin | 2010-12-22 17:30:34 | Re: pgsqlodbc 09_00_0200 is twice as slow on inserts as jdbc driver |
| Previous Message | Radosław Smogura | 2010-12-22 14:11:08 | Re: Comparing Enumerated Types between JDBC and ODBC drivers |