Re: Understanding PostgreSQL Storage Engines

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Carlos Mennens <carlos(dot)mennens(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Understanding PostgreSQL Storage Engines
Date: 2010-10-13 11:35:57
Message-ID: AANLkTin56Yvwtv=xXLm-B6J440vxiHvy7J76BQ=EM4ou@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Ron Mayer
<rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> wrote:
> Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> 2010/10/8 Carlos Mennens <carlos(dot)mennens(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>>> I know that MySQL uses MyISAM storage engine by default... what
>>> storage engine does PostgreSQL use by default ...
>>
>> PostgreSQL supports and uses just only one storage engine - PostgreSQL.
>
> That said, ISTM one of Postgres's bigger strengths commercially seems
> to be that vendors can reasonably easily plug in different storage engines.

That depends on how you define "reasonably easily". It's not even
remotely close to the ease with which you can plugin a different
storage engine in MySQL, and would take a significant amount of
engineering expertise and effort.

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thom Brown 2010-10-13 12:11:18 Re: Understanding PostgreSQL Storage Engines
Previous Message Ron Mayer 2010-10-13 11:29:03 Re: Understanding PostgreSQL Storage Engines