Re: KEEPONLYALNUM for pg_trgm is not documented

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: KEEPONLYALNUM for pg_trgm is not documented
Date: 2011-03-11 08:59:22
Message-ID: AANLkTin45m1eGAmOsTwMrNq1fR42EfFbd7+wXFhQnWR1@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Itagaki Takahiro
<itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> contrib/pg_trgm in 9.1 becomes more attractive feature by index supports
> for LIKE operators, but only alphabet and numeric characters are indexed
> by default. But, we can modify KEEPONLYALNUM in the source code to
> keep all characters in n-gram words.
>
> However, the limitation and KEEPONLYALNUM are not documented in the page:
>  http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/pgtrgm.html
>
> An additonal documentation patches acceptable? The issues would be a FAQ for
> non-English users. I heard that pg_trgm will be one of the *killer features*
> of 9.1 in Japan, where N-gram based text search is preferred.

+10

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2011-03-11 09:58:09 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Basic Recovery Control functions for use in Hot Standby. Pause,
Previous Message Itagaki Takahiro 2011-03-11 08:52:25 KEEPONLYALNUM for pg_trgm is not documented