| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | r t <pgsql(at)xzilla(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Steve Singer <ssinger(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>, Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index |
| Date: | 2010-12-03 20:27:57 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTin3XHvfGS_Qw_Art1MTQRkdqnyC0A3VvuFNTpnE@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 2:56 PM, r t <pgsql(at)xzilla(dot)net> wrote:
> What exactly was the objection to the following -->
> ALTER TABLE table_name ADD PRIMARY KEY (column_list) USING index_name;
> Is the objection that you might have been trying to specify a constraint
> named "using" ? I'm willing to make that option more difficult. :-)
I think it's that someone might expect the word after USING to be the
name of an index AM.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-12-03 21:41:44 | Re: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-12-03 20:25:02 | Re: [PATCH] Revert default wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux 2.6.33+ |