Re: would hw acceleration help postgres (databases in general) ?

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Hamza Bin Sohail <hsohail(at)purdue(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: would hw acceleration help postgres (databases in general) ?
Date: 2010-12-11 00:18:27
Message-ID: AANLkTin2ZnLaa7J6eW5V6PxVwOzpnsAkfPYNqsmPN6OU@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Hamza Bin Sohail <hsohail(at)purdue(dot)edu> wrote:
>
> Hello hackers,
>
> I think i'm at the right place to ask this question.
>
> Based on your experience and the fact that you have written the Postgres code,
> can you tell what a rough break-down - in your opinion - is for the time the
> database spends time just "fetching and writing " stuff to memory and the
> actual computation.

The database is a general purpose tool. Pick a bottleneck you wish to have,
and probably someone uses it in a way that causes that bottleneck to occur.

> The reason i ask this is because off-late there has been a
> push to put reconfigurable hardware on processor cores. What this means is that
> database writers can possibly identify the compute-intensive portions of the
> code and write hardware accelerators and/or custom instructions and offload
> computation to these hardware accelerators which they would have programmed
> onto the FPGA.

When people don't use prepared statements, parsing can become a bottleneck.

If Bison's yyparse could be put on a FPGA in a transparent way, than
anyone using
Bison, including PG, might benefit.

That's just one example, of course.

Cheers,

Jeff

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cédric Villemain 2010-12-11 00:34:50 Re: unlogged tables
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2010-12-11 00:17:55 Re: ALTER EXTENSION ... UPGRADE;